Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Model Penilaian Kinestetik dalam Menilai Tari I-pop (Modern Dance)

Abstract

ABSTRACT

 

The Research aims to gain a kinesthetic assessment models used in assessing the i-pop dance (modern dance), because judging a dance performance is often not objective and not based on the theory of dance. Element of subjectivity and sense of art of assessors tend to provide an assessment that is not in accordance with the provisions that must be measured or assessed.

The method used by the mixed method, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, in which the grains analyzed through validity and reliability, resulting in a valid and reliable instrument with two calibration is the calibration phase 1 and phase 2. So that the instrument has good quality in the construct, the kualitatuf testing done through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of experts consisting of choreographers, professional dancers, and academics in the field of dance and fine art.

Based on these results , the instruments are to be used in competitions at each race event. These results are expected to solve the problem in any event the modern dance competition dance (i-pop dance), so that the assessors and the public is more intelligent and has a good attitude of appreciation in assessing dance.

 

Keywords: i-pop dance (modern dance), assessment, kinesthetic, dance

 

 

 

 

ABSTRAK

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan model penilaian kinestetik yang diguna- kan untuk menilai Tari I-pop (modern dance). Penilaian suatu pertunjukan tari seringkali ti- dak objektif dan tidak didasari pada teori tentang tari, karena unsur subjektivitas dan sense of art dari penilai cenderung memberikan penilaian yang tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang harus diukur atau dinilai.

Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan mix method yaitu menggabungkan metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif, di mana butir dianalisis melalui uji validitas dan reliabilitas, se- hingga menghasilkan instrumen yang valid dan reliabel dengan dua kali kalibrasi yaitu kalibrasi tahap 1 dan tahap 2. Instrumen memiliki kualitas yang baik secara konstruk, maka pengujian kualitatif dilakukan melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dari para pakar yang terdiri atas koreografer, penari professional, dan akademisi di bidang seni tari dan seni rupa.

Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut, maka instrumen sudah dapat digunakan dalam kegiatan lomba di setiap even perlombaan. Hasil ini diharapkan dapat memecahkan ma- salah dalam setiap even lomba tari modern dance (i-pop dance), sehingga penilai dan ma- syarakat lebih cerdas dan memiliki sikap apresiasi yang baik dalam menilai tari.

 

Kata kunci: i-pop dance (modern dance), penilaian, kinestetik, tari

PDF

References

  1. Asmawi Zainul dan Noehi Nasoetion
  2. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Bahan
  3. Ajar Universitas Terbuka.
  4. Cangelosi, James S.
  5. Designing Test for Evaluating Student
  6. Achievement. New York: Longman
  7. Edi Sedyawati, dkk.
  8. Pengetahuan Elementer Tari dan Bebera- pa Masalah Tari. Jakarta: Direktorat Kesenian Proyek Pengembangan Ke- senian Jakarta, Departemen Pendi- dikan dan Kebudayaan.
  9. Gronlund, Norman E.
  10. How to Make Achievement Test and
  11. Assessments. New York: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
  12. Harrow, Anita J.
  13. A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Doma- in: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York: Longman, Inc
  14. Hawkins, Alma M.
  15. Mencipta Lewat Tari, terjemahan Y.
  16. Sumandiyo Hadi. Yogyakarta: Insti- tut Seni Indonesia.
  17. Kraus, Richard
  18. History of The Dance in Art and edu- cation. EnglewoodCliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  19. Martin, John
  20. The Modern Dance. New York: Prince- ton Book Company.
  21. Masri Singarimbun dan Sofian Effendi
  22. Psychology Testing and Measurement. 1989 Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta:
  23. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. LP3ES.
  24. ---------------,
  25. Meri, La
  26. Moh. Jazuli
  27. Telaah Teoretis Seni Tari. Semarang: IKIP Press.
  28. Sal Murgianto
  29. Koreografi: Pengetahuan Dasar Kom- posisi Tari. Jakarta: Direktorat Jen- dral Pendidkan Dasar dan Mene- ngah Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  30. Simpson, Elizabeth, Norman E. Gronlund, and others
  31. Bloom’s Taxonomy: Psychomotor Domain,
  32. (http://www.olemiss.edu/depts/edu_
  33. school2/docs/stai_manual/manual 10
  34. htm, diakses 20 Februari 2011).
  35. Soedarsono
  36. Tari Tradisional Indonesia. Jakarta: Ha- rapan Kita.
  37. Sumadi Suryabrata
  38. Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologis.
  39. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset
  40. Thraves, Barbara, dan Diana Williamson
  41. Now for a Dance. Phoenix: Albert Part
  42. Education.