Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 31 No. 2 (2021)
Estetika Dalam Keberagaman Fungsi, Makna, dan Nilai Seni

Articles

Finding “Appeal” Factors in Local Animation Character Design: Formalistic and Visual Semiotic Analysis (FVSA)

https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v31i2.1576

Published 2021-06-30

  • Teddy Marius Soikun
    • ,
  • Ag. Asri Ag. Ibrahim

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor ‘daya tarik’ dalam desain karakter animasi lokal. ‘Daya tarik’ adalah salah satu dari 12 prinsip desain animasi dan sering dianggap ambigu. Untuk mencapai ‘daya tarik’, salah satu metode yang digunakan adalah Viewer’s Impression Words (VIW) yang merupakan modifikasi dari Kansei Words (KW). Metode ini menggabungkan teori formalistik dan semiotik visual untuk mencapai Viewer’s Impression Words (VIW), bagian penting dari Kansei Engineering. Hasil penelitian daripada ujikaji ini, dapat disimpulkan bahawa metod ini mampu untuk membantu peserta ujikaji memilih kata VIW yang sesuai seterusnya ke arah aktiviti selanjutnya iaitu proses prinsip longgar. Metode ini dilihat sebagai teknik baru untuk memperbaiki proses dalam memperoleh VIW atau Kansei Words untuk digunakan dalam latihan pengukuran untuk menemukan pengaruh (emosi) dalam memahami ‘daya tarik.’ Ini untuk mencapai prinsip longgar dalam desain karakter animasi lokal.

Kata kunci: Kata Impressi Penonton, Desain Berasaskan Pengguna, Desain Karakter

PDF DOWNLOAD

References

  1. Journal Article
  2. Ashwin, C, (1984). Drawing, Design, and
  3. Semiotics. Design Issues, Vol. 1, No. 2
  4. (Autumn, 1984), Pp. 42-52, 42–52.
  5. Chapman, M., Ostwald, M. ., & Tucker, C. (2004).
  6. Semiotics, Interpretation, and Political
  7. Resistance in Architecture, Contexts of
  8. Architecture. The 38th International
  9. Conference of Architectural Science
  10. Association ANZAScA 2004,
  11. Launceston, Tasmania.
  12. Khalis, F. M., & Mustafa, N., (2017). Cultural
  13. Inspirations towards Malaysian Animation
  14. Character Design. Malaysian Journal of
  15. Communication, 33.
  16. Kurosu, M. (2019). Human-Computer Interaction.
  17. Perspectives on Design: Thematic Area,
  18. HCI 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI
  19. International Conference, HCII 2019,
  20. Orlando, FL, USA, July 26–31, 2019,
  21. Proceedings, Part I. Springer.
  22. Mohd Yusoff, M. D. (2014). Visualizing Peran
  23. in Makyung as 3D Animated Character.
  24. Proceeding of the Social Sciences
  25. Research ICSRR 2014 Kota Kinabalu,
  26. Sabah, 465–474.
  27. Ramadin, T. Y., & Mulyana, D. (2012).
  28. Memahami Makna dan Tanda dalam
  29. Objek Visual Arsitektur Ruang Publik.
  30. Panggung, 22(1), Article 1. https://doi.
  31. org/10.26742/panggung.v22i1.37
  32. Saidi, A. I., & Budiwaspada, A. E. (2015).
  33. Visualisasi dan Transformasi Kebertubuhan
  34. Dalam Film Animasi Planes (Ke Arah
  35. Pembentukan Mitos Baru). Panggung,
  36. (4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.26742/
  37. panggung.v25i4.41
  38. Soikun, T., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2018). Kansei
  39. Engineering Approach in Designing
  40. Appealing Animation Character.
  41. Proceedings of the 7th International
  42. Conference on Kansei Engineering and
  43. Emotion Research 2018: KEER 2018,
  44. -22 March 2018, Kuching, Sarawak,
  45. Malaysia. Proceedings of the 7th
  46. International Conference on Kansei
  47. Engineering and Emotion Research
  49. Tinarbuko, S. (2017). Semiotika Tanda Verbal dan
  50. Tanda Visual Iklan Layanan Masyarakat. Panggung, 26(2), Article 2. https://doi.
  51. org/10.26742/panggung.v26i2.175
  52. Books
  53. Barthes, R. 1964. Rhetoric Of The Image. In
  54. eds. Evans, Jessica & Hall, Stuart (1999).
  55. Visual Culture: The Reader. London, Sage
  56. Publications.
  57. Berger, J. (1990). Ways of Seeing [ WAYS OF
  58. SEEING ] By Berger, John ( Author )Dec01-1990 Paperback. Penguin Books.
  59. Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics.
  60. London & New York: Routledge Taylor
  61. & Francis Group.
  62. Fiske (1982): Introduction to Communication
  63. Studies. London: Routledge
  64. Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. van. 2006. Reading
  65. Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2
  66. edition). London: Routledge.
  67. Nagamachi, M. (1999). Kansei Engineering: the
  68. implication and applications to product
  69. development. 6, 273–278.
  70. Tomos, Y. 2013. The Significance of Anime as
  71. a Novel Animation Form, Referencing
  72. Selected Works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi
  73. Kon, and Mamoru Oshii. Aberystwyth
  74. University, Department of Theatre,
  75. Film, and Television Studies.
  76. Tomaselli (1996) Appropriating images. The
  77. semiotics of visual representation.
  78. Højbjerg: Intervention Press. 1996. xx +
  79. pp. Pb.: ISBN 87 89825 05 5.
  80. Tsukamoto, H. (2006). Manga Matrix: Create
  81. Unique Characters Using the Japanese
  82. Matrix System. New York; Tokyo:
  83. Harper Design.
  84. Turkcan, B. (2013). Semiotic Approach to
  85. the Analysis of Children’s Drawings.
  86. Educational Sciences: Theory &
  87. Practice, 1(13), 600–607.
  88. Wells, P. (2002). Animation – Genre and
  89. Authorship. London; New York:
  90. Wallflower Press.
  91. Websites
  92. Hoare, J. (2017). Semiotics in Animation.
  93. Medium.com. Retrieved from https://
  94. medium.com/@joshhoare/semiotics-inanimation-e8178750c272
  95. Mozyrko, B. (2020). The Benefits of Merging
  96. Quantitative and Qualitative Data In
  97. UX Studies—Usability Geek. https://
  98. usabilitygeek.com/benefits-ofmerging-quantitative-and-qualitativedata-in-ux-studies/
  99. Parsa, A. F. n.d. Visual Semiotics: How Still
  100. Images Mean? Interpreting still images by
  101. Using Semiotics Approaches. Retrieved
  102. from http://akademik.maltepe.edu.
  103. tr/~osmanurper/g%F6rselimajy%F6n/
  104. visual%20semiotics%20how%20
  105. still%20images%20mean.pdf
  106. Snitkjær, C. (2019). Animated Thoughts.
  107. Retrieved June 22, 2019, from
  108. Animated Thoughts website: https://
  109. christinesnitkjaer.com/2019/03/teachyourself-appeal.html
  110. Tate. (n.d.). Formalism – Art Term. Tate. Retrieved
  111. June 16, 2020, from https://www.tate.
  112. org.uk/art/art-terms/f/formalism