Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 35 No. 1 (2025)
Wacana Seni dalam Identitas, Simbol, Pendidikan Karakter, Moral Spiritual dan Promosi

Articles

Milestones and Meanings of Puri Agung Karangasem Ornaments in Hermeneutic Perspective

https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v35i1.3632

Published 2025-03-01

  • I Nyoman Laba
    • ,
  • I Wayan Adnyana
    • ,
  • I Ketut Muka
    • ,
  • I Wayan Suardana
    • ,
  • Ida Ayu Gede Artayani

I Nyoman Laba
Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar

I Wayan Adnyana
Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar

I Ketut Muka
Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar

I Wayan Suardana
Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar

Ida Ayu Gede Artayani
Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar

Abstract

The architecture of Puri Agung Karangasem shows important achievements in architectural progress and the trajectory of the meaning of ornaments shows the acculturation of Balinese, Chinese, and European cultures. Researchers have not found research on the milestones and meaning of ornaments in the Puri. The purpose of this research is to explain the important historical achievements and the meaning of architectural ornaments of Puri Agung Karangasem. A qualitative descriptive method is implemented to explain the milestones and meaning of architectural ornaments of Puri Agung Karangasem. Hermeneutic theory is used as an approach to uncover the historicity and interpretation of the meaning of the architectural ornaments of the Puri. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews and documentation, while as a source of data are ornaments on palace architecture, cultural experts, community leaders, and as key informants of Penglingsir Puri and Abdi Dalem Puri. The results of the study show that the architecture of Puri Agung Karangasem has a very important meaning and achievement in the history of Bali, especially in the context of the kingdom. The forms of ornaments found in Puri Agung Karangasem can be distinguished into three, namely ornaments in traditional Balise, Chinese and European styles, resulting in a combination of typical ornamental forms of Puri Agung Karangasem. From a hermeneutic perspective, these ornaments are signs that refer to certain aspects of social, religious, and political life in Bali, especially the kingdom of Karangasem. In addition, the ruler of Puri Agung Karangasem in ancient times had a fairly good cultural relationship with people from China and Europe, as reflected in the visualization of ornaments integrated into the architecture of the Puri.

Keywords

Milestone, Ornament, Meaning, Puri Agung Karangasem

PDF

References

  1. Anshari. (2009). Hermeneutika Sebagai Teori dan Metode Interpretasi Makna Teks Sastra. Sawerigading: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 187–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v15i2.54
  2. Ardika, I. W., Parimartha, I. G., & Suryawan, A. A. B. (2015). Sejarah Bali Dari Prasejarah Hingga Modern (I. G. Parimartha, Ed.; Cetakan Kedua). Udayana University Press.
  3. Covarrubias, M. (1973). Island Of Bali. Singapore: Periplus Editions.
  4. Djelantik, A. A. M. (1999). Estetika Sebuah Pengantar (Cetakan I). Masyarakat Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia.
  5. Gelebet, I. N. (1982). Arsitektur Tradisional Bali. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Proyek Inventarisasi dan Dokumentasi Kebudayaan Daerah Bali.
  6. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews and Focus Groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
  7. Girindrawardani, A. A. A. D. (2018). Eksistensi Puri Agung Karangasem Dalam Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa Dan Budaya III, 41–49.
  8. Gramsci, A. (2000). Sejarah dan Budaya (Selection From The Prison Note Books of Antonio Gramsci, 1971) (I. Puspitorini, Ed.). Pustaka Promethea.
  9. Hendriyana, H. (2022). Meaning Differences in Indigenous Kriya and Crafts in Indonesia and Their Leverage on the Craft of Science Globally. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 22(2), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v22i2.36567
  10. Kalam, A. A. R., Tjidera, G. W., Subrata, I. W., Ardana, I. Gst. N., & Buda, I. W. (1988). Ragam Hias di Puri Karangasem.
  11. Kartika, N., Piliang, Y. A., Santosa, I., & Dienaputra, R. D. (2020). The Visual Arts of Masjid Agung Sang Cipta Rasa Cirebon: Hybrid Culture Identity. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 20(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v20i1.17525
  12. Kurniawan, A., Salain, P. R., Dwijendra, N. K. A., & Rajendra, I. G. N. A. (2020). Deconstruction of Mandala’s Puri Agung Karangasem. International Journal of Engineering and Emerging Technology, 4(2), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.24843/ijeet.2019.v04.i02.p12
  13. Lufiani, A., Sabana, S., & Haldani, A. (2017). Aesthetics and Functions of Craft Art in Public Art Space. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 17(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v17i1.9399
  14. Ma’as, A. A., & Yuliati, D. (2020). Diplomasi Kebudayaan antara Keraton Yogyakarta dan Pemerintah Kolonial Belanda pada Masa Pemerintahan Sultan Hamengku Buwana VIII, 1921-1939. Historiografi, 1(2), 143–152. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/historiografi/article/view/29768
  15. Mariasa, I. N. (2015). Taksu and Pangus As An Aesthetic Concept Entity of Bali Dance. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 15(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v15i2.4557
  16. Munandar, A. A. (2005). Istana Dewa Pulau Dewata: Makna Puri Bali Abad Ke-14 s/d Abad Ke-14-19 Masehi (Cetakan I). Komunitas Bambu.
  17. Palmer, R. E. (2022). Hermeneutika: Teori Interpretasi Dalam Pemikiran Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, dan Gadamer (Cetakan I). IRCiSoD.
  18. Putra Agung, A. A. G. (1996). Peralihan Sistem Birokrasi Kerajaan Karangasem 1890 – 1938. Universitas Gajah Mada.
  19. Putra Agung, A. A. G. (2009). Peralihan Sistem Birokrasi Dari Tradisional ke Kolonial (Cetakan III). Pustaka Pelajar.
  20. Raharja, I. G. M. (2017). East and West Cross Cultural Semiotics. On Taman Ujung Bali Architecture. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 14(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.3726/cul.2017.01.15
  21. Rustarmadi. (2012). Ragam Hias Pada Pendapa Teras Candi Panataran di Blitar. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education, 12(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v12i2.2526
  22. Salain, P. R. (2016). Puri Agung Karangasem; Karya Agung Asitektur Bali Timur.
  23. Santoso, R. B. (2016). Dinamika dan Keragaman Pembentuk Identitas Arsitektural Pada Bangunan Bersejarah di Bali dan Cirebon. Seminar Karya Dan Pameran Mahasiswa Arsitektur Indonesia Multikulturalisme Arsitektur Di Indonesia 26 Department of Architecture Universitas Islam Indonesia, 26–33.
  24. Siswati, E. (2018). Anatomi Teori Hegemoni Antonio Gramsci. Translitera : Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 5(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.35457/translitera.v5i1.355
  25. Sp Gustami. (2007). Butir-Butir Mutiara Estetika Timur: Ide Dasar Penciptaan Seni Kriya Indonesia. Prasista.
  26. Suardina, N., Suardana, I. W., & Laba, I. N. (2022). Patra Punggel Dalam Telaah Konsep Penciptaan Seni Visual. Panggung: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 31(4), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v31i4.1907
  27. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  28. Sulistyawati. (2008). Integrasi Arsitektur Tionghoa ke Dalam Arsitektur Puri Agung Karangasem. Makalah Seminar, 1–14.
  29. Sulistyawati, Ardika, I. W., Bandem, I. M., Ratna, I. N. K., Beratha, N. L. S., & Wirawan, A. A. B. (2011). Integrasi Budaya Tionghoa ke Dalam Budaya Bali dan Indonesia (Sebuah Bunga Rampai) (Sulistyawati, Ed.). Universitas Udayana.
  30. Sumantika, W. (2007, May 12). Interaksi Budaya Tercermin Pada Ornamen. Koran Bali Post, 13.
  31. Sunarya, I. K. (2022). Kriya di Pulau Bali: Ketakson, Kerajinan, dan Kitsch. Panggung, 32(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.26742/panggung.v32i1.1728
  32. Sunmola, H. O. (2020). Evaluation of Motivating and Requiring Factors for Milestones in IT Projects. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1469–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.204
  33. Toekio M., S. (1987). Mengenal Ragam Hias Indonesia. Angkasa.
  34. INTERVIEWS
  35. Anak Agung Kosalya, (63 tahun), Penglingsir Puri Agung Karangasem sekaligus pengelola Taman Air Tirta Gangga
  36. I Made Juliarta, (56 Tahun). Abdi Dalem Puri Agung Karangasem Kota Karangasem