Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

MAKNA SIMBOL BENTUK DAN SENI HIAS PADA RUMAH BUGIS SULAWESI SELATAN

Abstract

The cosmologic view of the Buginese tribe assumes that this macrocosmos (the universe) is arranged into three levels: Boting langi’ (the upper world), Ale kawa (the middle world), Uri’ Li’yu’ (the Under world). As the centre from the three parts of this universe is Boting Langi (the highest sky), the place of Dewata SeuwaE (God) to lie down. This view is represented in the King’s Palace/traditional house building seen as the microcosmos. So, the King’s palace of the Buginese is devided also into three levels (stacks), those are: Rekkeang (top floor) viewed as the head of the human being, Alle bola (the body of the house) viewed as the body, and Awa bola (space underneath of the house) viewed as the leg of the human being. The three parts are centered at Posi’ bola or the house navel. This research tries to answer the problems: 1) whether the meaning form of the King’s Palace of the Buginese based on cosmology, and 2) how the symbol meaning of decorative art at the King’s Palace of the Buginese is. To identify and comprehend the meaning of decorative art on the King’s Palace of the Buginese, it is done through hermeneutic theory by Gadamer and the symbol meaning theory by Victor Turner. This research gives description that the happening of structural change and the style of decorated art at the kings’ palace of the Buginese of South Sulawesi, beside having much influence from the art of Dong-son and Chou Tua style, the decorated art at the Buginese tribe also got influence from Hinduism and Islam. In addition, the change of the art style is decided also by the one who has power in the society, either in the politic side or in the religion or culture. In this case, the existence of art style variation is caused by the existence of the levelling and groupping of the society.

Keyword: Decorated art, Buginese tribe.

PDF

References

  1. Al-Fariqi, Ismail Raji
  2. Seni Tauhid-Esensi an Ekspersi Estetika Islam. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Bentang Budaya.
  3. Budihardjo, Eko
  4. Rumah sebagai Warisan Budaya. Jakarta: Djambatan.
  5. Gadamer, Hans-Georg
  6. Kebenaran dan Metode, Pengantar Filsafat Hermeneutika. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
  7. Pelajar.
  8. Gadamer- Hans-Georg
  9. Philosophical Hermeneutics, dalam E. Sumaryono, Hermeneutik: Sebuah Metode
  10. Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  11. Geerz, Clifford
  12. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
  13. Hoop, A.N.J. Th a Th. van der
  14. Indonesische Sier Motieven. Bandung;s’ Gravenhage, N.V. Uitgeverij W. van Hoeve.
  15. Kleden, Leo
  16. “Teks, Cerita, Transformasi Kreatifâ€, dalam Kalam: Jurnal Kebudayaan, Edisi 10.
  17. Koentjaraningrat
  18. Kebudayaan, Mentalitet dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  19. Kuntowijoyo
  20. Metodologi Sejarah, edisi kedua. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya.
  21. Miksic, John
  22. “Tahap Berburu dan Meramu di Indonesia Timur†dalam John Miksic. Sejarah Awal. Jakarta: Buku Antar Bangsa untuk Grolier International. Inc.
  23. Miles, Matthew B. dan A. Michael Huberman
  24. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru, terjemahan Tjetjep R. Rohidi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
  25. Soejono, R. P.
  26. “Rumah Tradisionalâ€, dalam Gunawan Tjahjono, Rumah. Jakarta: Buku Antar Bangsa untuk Grolier International Inc.
  27. Turner, Victor.
  28. The Forest of Symbols: Aspecs of` Ndembu Ritual: London: Cornell Paperback,
  29. Cornell University Press.
  30. Yusuf, Wiwiek P, Sahriah, dan Endang
  31. Upacara Tradisional (Upacara Kematian) Daerah Sulawesi Selatan. Ujung Pandang: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  32. Nara Sumber:
  33. Abdul Kahar Wahid, wawancara, Makassar, 07 Agustus 2011.
  34. Abdul Samad, wawancara, Kabupaten Sidrap, 11 September 2011.
  35. Dg. Mabbara, wawancara, Kabupaten Bone, 17 September 2011.